Validated ≠ Leaderboards
Benchmarks are useful—but they don’t prove your model is ready for real work. I design fit‑for‑purpose evaluations and the operational controls that make AI/LLMs both useful in R&D and auditable when stakes are higher.
What I Bring
.Context of Use → risk: we define the decision, users, and failure modes so evidence matches impact.
Traceable, domain data: eval sets with lineage (ALCOA+), leakage checks, and realistic edge cases.
Pre‑registered acceptance criteria: metrics, thresholds, sample sizes—agreed up front.
HITL built‑in: review thresholds, work instructions, training.
Lifecycle ready: monitoring/drift KPIs, owners, alerts, golden‑set cadence.
Change control for retraining: triggers, impact assessment, rollback, release notes.
Benchmark Theater
vs
Real Validation
Fit‑for‑Purpose = meets pre‑registered, risk‑aware criteria on traceable data for the decision it supports—and can be operated, monitored, and changed under control.
R&D Fit-for-Purpose Sprint
Packages
Deliverables:
CoU & risk rubric
Eval set + error taxonomy
Acceptance criteria
Small pilot
Decision memo
GxP Validate -Launch
Deliverables:
Validation protocol
Report
Supplier qualification
Change control
Monitoring/drift
Audit pack
Monitor - Improve (retainer)
Deliverables:
Validation protocol & report
Supplier qualification
Change control
Monitoring/drift
Audit pack
Curious if you’re fit-for-purpose today?
Book a 20‑minute fit check. I’ll walk through the scorecard, flag gaps, and recommend the smallest experiment that proves value.